Issue #3

Agronomic Production

 

 

Problem, Opportunity Statement

 

Pennsylvania agronomic crop producers are facing many changes that influence their long-term sustainability. Market volatility is increasingly influenced by international trade, the public’s perceptions of agricultural production practices, and consumer preferences. New production and management technologies (i.e., yield monitors, GIS, GPS, transgenic crops, niche market cultivars, record keeping and planning systems, etc.) are being offered to producers with the promise of increased profits and reduced labor. Many of these technologies are being marketed with minimal scientific testing by independent agencies. The true economic value of many new information, pest management, and crop production technologies is unknown or limited information is available. While faced with limited science-based information, farmers are faced with information overload from multiple sources (extension, industry, popular press, etc.) that present quite different views on a specific technology’s value. Compounding the complexity of making sound crop management decisions in this ever changing world is the increasing influence of the general public on policies that influence crop production and the use of new technologies. Despite all these complexities, profit margins for agronomic crops remain low.

 

Selecting economically appropriate crop production technologies is dependent on farm size, farm structure, geographic location, production goals, and market volatility. Continued farm sustainability may also mean exploring new market opportunities. Providing state-of-the-art information that addresses these issues and providing methods of making decision in an ever changing world is a major challenge, particularly given the diverse audience of clientele who influence on-farm decision making. The challenge to Cooperative Extension is to help diverse clientele understand when and how new technologies should be used, how to comply with government regulations that are required on their farm, and to educate the general public about stewardship efforts in the agricultural community that meet their concerns about food safety, environmental protection, and food security. Accomplishing these goals will require networking between industry, government agencies, consumer groups, educators, and extension personnel. Continuing financial support for these efforts will depend on how well we reach out to inform the general public, particularly underserved groups, about the impacts of our efforts. Through building larger teams that include industry, government agencies, farmers, farmer organizations, primary and secondary educators, consumer groups, and Cooperative Extension we can build on our past successes and transition Cooperative Extension into the 21st century.

 

 

Subject Matter Areas

 

  • Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

(Weeds, Insects and other Invertebrates, Disease, Vertebrate)

 

  • Soil Quality/Management

 

  • Grain Crop Production

 

  • Nutrient Management

 

  • Forage Crop Production

 

  • Organic Production

 

 

Program Titles and/or Program Topics by Subject Matter Area

 

  • Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

(Weeds, Insects and other Invertebrates, Disease, Vertebrate)

o       Scouting Technology

o       Economic thresholds

o       Use of Predictive Models

o       Tactic selection

o       Pest Biology

o       Resistance Management/Refuge Implementation

 

  • Soil Quality/Management

o       Impacts on profitability

o       Impacts on natural resource quality

 

  • Grain Crop Production

o       Physiology and crop development principles

o       Optimization of crop management practices

o       Factors that affect management decisions

o       New technologies for Pennsylvania Producers

o       Public issues related to Crop production

 

  • Nutrient Management

o       Producer education issues for improving nutrient management

o       Public education issues related to nutrient management

o       Development of informed ag advisors

o       Education of policy makers and agency personnel

 

  • Forage Crop Production

o       Evaluation of production costs of alternative forages

o       Improve consistency

o       Change traditional management practices

o       Evaluate custom harvesting

o       Modify harvest and storage practices

o       Increase pasture acreages

o       Improve profitability

o       Enhanced soil and water quality

 

  • Organic Production

o       Increased opportunities

o       Improved collaboration among partners

o       Public education on ag issues

o       Research based decision making

o       Improving the ability of producers to adapt to changing conditions

 

 

Resources

 

  • Nutrient Management

o       3 faculty/ staff

o       30 agents

o       Agency partnerships – USDA, PDA, Conservation Districts

o       Commodity groups

o       Agribusiness

o       Media

o       Various Extension funding sources and grants

o       Federal Research/Extension grants

o       Gifts and In-kind support

o       Contracts and Cooperative agreements

o       Local sponsors

o       Registration fees

o       Curriculum and extension education materials

o       County government

o       Volunteers

o       Research Farm facilities and staff

o       University infrastructure for research and extension programs

o       Needs assessment results

o       Surveys and evaluations

 

  • Sustainable Ag – IPM

o       Pest management websites

o       Industry

o       Farm organizations

o       Federal grants

o       State grants

o       Agronomy Guide

o       Pest sheets

o       Government programs

o       News media

o       PowerPoint presentations

o       Videos

o       Farmer Organizations

o       Research Farm Facilities and Staff

o       University Infrastructure of Research and Extension

o       Research Faculty

o       Volunteers

o       On-farm Research Staff (Ron Hoover)

 

  • Sustainable Ag – Forages

o     30 PSU Faculty and support staff in the Departments of Crop and Soil Science, Dairy and Animal, SciencesEntomology, Plant Pathology, Ag Engineering and Biological Sciences, Veterinary Sciences

o    40 county and regional based extension educators

o     Agricultural businesses and suppliers

o     Advisory committees

o     Volunteers

o     County, state, and federal agencies

o     Commodity groups

o     Pennsylvania Forage and Grassland Council

o     Livestock, Dairy and Horse Owner Associations

o     University infrastructure for research and extension programs

o     Research farm facilities and staff

o     Curriculum and extension education materials

o     Farm press

o     Needs assessments

o    S urveys

o     Funding sources

o     Federal Research and Extension Grants

o     Gifts and in-kind support

o     Contracts and cooperative agreements

o     Local sponsors

o     Registration fees

 

  • Sustainable Ag – Grain Production

o       5 faculty/ staff

o       30 agents

o       Agency partnerships – USDA, PDA, Conservation Districts

o       Commodity groups

o       Agribusiness

o       Media

o       Various Extension funding sources and grants

o       Federal Research/Extension grants

o       Gifts and In-kind support

o       Contracts and Cooperative agreements

o       Local sponsors

o       Registration fees

o       Curriculum and extension education materials

o       County government

o       Volunteers

o       Research Farm facilities and staff

o       University infrastructure for research and extension programs

o       Needs assessment results

o       Surveys and evaluations

o        

  • Organic Production, Alternative Crops, Production Systems

o       15 faculty/ staff

o       30 agents

o       Agency partnerships – USDA, PDA, Conservation Districts

o       Commodity groups

o       Grower Associations

o       Agribusiness

o       Media

o       Various Extension funding sources and grants

o       Federal Research/Extension grants

o       Gifts and In-kind support

o       Contracts and Cooperative agreements

o       Local sponsors

o       Registration fees

o       Curriculum and extension education materials

o       County government

o       Volunteers

o       Research Farm facilities and staff

o       University infrastructure for research and extension programs

o       Needs assessment results

o       Surveys and evaluations

 

  • Soil Quality/Management

o       15 faculty/ staff

o       30 agents

o       Agency partnerships – USDA, PDA, Conservation Districts

o       Commodity groups

o       Agribusiness

o       Media

o       Various Extension funding sources and grants

o       Federal Research/Extension grants

o       Gifts and In-kind support

o       Contracts and Cooperative agreements

o       Local sponsors

o       Registration fees

o       Curriculum and extension education materials

o       County government

o       Volunteers

o       Research Farm facilities and staff

o       University infrastructure for research and extension programs

o       Needs assessment results

o       Surveys and evaluations

 

  • Sustainable Ag – Overall

o       15 faculty/ staff

o       30 agents

o       Agency partnerships – USDA, PDA, Conservation Districts

o       Commodity groups

o       Agribusiness

o       Media

o       Various Extension funding sources and grants

o       Federal Research/Extension grants

o       Gifts and In-kind support

o       Contracts and Cooperative agreements

o       Local sponsors

o       Registration fees

o       Curriculum and extension education materials

o       County government

o       Volunteers

o       Research Farm facilities and staff

o       University infrastructure for research and extension programs

o       Needs assessment results

o       Surveys and evaluations

 

 

Indicators

 

  • Number of individuals demonstrating increase in subject knowledge (all program areas).
  • Number of producers who implement sustainable agricultural practices.
  • Number of producers reporting success in developing sustainable agricultural systems or adopting components of these systems.
  • Number of producers who develop nutrient management plans.
  • Number of advisors who become certified to write nutrient management plans.
  • Number of producers reporting success in developing and implementing nutrient management plans.
  • Number of advisors who evaluate/document nutrient management performance.